Is Literature Dying?

Okay, the new podcast is off to a great start! Many thanks to all the listeners, wherever you are, and whoever you may be.

It seems that a lot of you have the same question I do:

Is literature dying?

I know what you’re thinking: sounds like a straw man! I get it, I get it. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred that kind of question results in a “No, it isn’t!” We all tune in for the fake drama, and in the end the host concludes what we all knew that he or she would. Literature’s not dying! It’s stronger than ever! Thank you for listening.

But…this might be that one hundredth time!

More to the point, I am not sure of the answer yet.

That’s right! I didn’t come up with this question as a clever way of attracting attention. This is not a disguised way of setting up a podcast about how great literature is, and let’s celebrate how wonderful it all is, and aren’t we all just spectacular beings for celebrating it all together, here in this celebration. This celebration of literature. And us. The lovers of literature.

No.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve always thought that literature is great. I’ve always thought it was powerful. A force for good. I believed in it.

Now I look around and…well, I’m not so sure we need it anymore.

What did we get from literature and great books that we can’t get elsewhere?

Reading is wonderful, of course…but so were handwritten letters. So was a morning newspaper.

We’ve moved on from those things. And maybe we’ve simply moved on from literature.

We don’t read as much as we used to–well, that’s not exactly true, is it? We probably read more than ever. And we probably write more than ever. We have a very literate society. It’s just that it’s all taking place on the internet.

Do we sit down and read big novels like Anna Karenina or Middlemarch? Maybe a few of us do, now and then. And some contemporary novels still sell copies, and some of those are weighty and important and cover serious topics and deserve their place on the shelf of Great Books. Some people still read them, just as some people still get their morning newspaper.

But are they essential?

It’s easy to blame ourselves for the declining sales and reduced position that literature has in today’s world. It’s all our fault! We’re easily distracted! We’re stupid! We prefer our phones or our videogames or social networking because we’re lazy and dumb. We used to be so much better.

I don’t think that’s the whole story.

I think we need to look harder at literature itself.

Why did we read before? For entertainment? Escapism? Moral instruction? Curiosity? Empathy? To better understand what it’s like to be another person in a world different from our own?

Isn’t all of that available now on Facebook? Blogs? Netflix?

Maybe it’s not our fault that literature has lost some of its relevance. Maybe literature just isn’t good enough at delivering what it’s supposed to deliver. Maybe it can’t compete.

So in that spirit, I have a podcast called The History of Literature. And yes, the title suggests that it’s a straightforward narrative. You know how those go. Book, book, book, author, author, author, period, period, period. We march from one phase to the next as easily as slipping out of our robe and into a warm bath.

But this isn’t a warm bath. It’s more of a quest. I feel like I’m out there battling monsters.

Yes, I’m going to cover as much great literature as I can. And yes, there will be times when I’ll be swept away with enthusiasm, because I’ll forget my concerns and embrace the power of literature. I know the feelings I get when I encounter the sublime. I recall the energy, the enthusiasm, the passion I’ve felt for novels and poems and stories and plays in the past.

In the past. Did you catch that? In the past.

Is it the same now? Or has something changed? Are we headed toward a sunset?

That’s what we’ll be exploring. Yes, these are undeniably great books. We can enjoy them, admire them, celebrate them–and we’ll be doing plenty of that, I’m not a zombie or a robot or a masochist.

But we’ll also be asking this more difficult question: What can these great books offer us today?

Join us on the quest!

history-of-literature-db

I’d love to hear your thoughts! Do you read as much as you once did? If not, why not? Where do you turn instead for the things that literature used to provide? Let us know in the comments!

For podcast listeners (or those of you new to the idea), the easiest way to get the podcast automatically downloaded to your phone (or tablet or computer or whatever else you like to listen to) is probably to subscribe via iTunes. You can direct download the mp3s, stream episodes, and find more subscription options at the main site, historyofliterature.com.

Do you have another preferred delivery mechanism I’m not providing? Let me know!

Enjoy!

zelda-scott-laughing
F. Scott Fitzgerald, Zelda Fitzgerald, and Scottie Fitzgerald.
Advertisement

8 thoughts on “Is Literature Dying?

  1. I really liked your post, and you raise some good questions. I need to listen to your podcast, too. This really makes me think about what I’ve read in the past, as well as what I read now. When I think of it, some older works that we think of as great literature now, may or may not were viewed that way when they were first written. And of the material I read now, I bounce from Batman and Superman comics to some E. A. Poe to Lovecraft to L. Frank Baum. Good questions you raise. 🙂

    Like

    1. Oooh, this is intriguing. I definitely count Poe as literature (he’s totally underrated, in my opinion), and I suppose Lovecraft and Baum count as well. Batman and Superman comics… are those? I think I could be persuaded that they are, at least the more graphic-novel-y ones.

      Like

    1. Glad to hear it! (That literature will always be a significant part of your life, I mean. NOT that I hurt your feelings – I’m sorry about that!) Let’s hope there are many people like you out there, both now and in the future!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Site Title
  3. I am not a good judge of whether literature is dying–tending to be on the outside of most social tracks. But for me, watching the papers and the magazines get thinner, watching my library dispose of books that I revere, watching people make books with solid bindings that would last for decades into art, cutting them into pieces–all these things make me panic some, and feel very sad.

    Like

  4. During more optimistic (read: sober) moments, I would perhaps argue that we are taking the word “literature” much too “literal”. If Homeric story-telling or Greek theatre were good enough for the masses, how are blogs, vlogs, podcasts, posts, tweets et al. not?

    I could argue that this is not a Marshall McLuhan “the media is the message” moment, but rather that the word, the story, the thought can be transmitted by any medium — except through Bugs Bunny and Yosemite Sam, you kind of got carried away there I fear — though now as I am typing this I dimly recall a Bugs Bunny Ring der Nibelungen cartoon … and wasn’t it Disney’s Fantasia which included “The spirits which I’ve summoned, my commands ignore” Goethe’s “Sorcerer’s Apprentice” moment?

    Almost managed to cheer myself up for a moment, before realizing that both Wagner nor Goethe are no longer known entities in today’s world and any allusions to them would be replaced by the wisdom of some Kardashian.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s