Wow. It has been a long time since an article has made me think (and rethink and rethink) as much as this piece in The Atlantic, The Forgotten Female Action Stars of the 1910s. I can’t get over it.
Just take a look at this publicity shot from 1918::
Here’s the description:
A city editor orders an armed female reporter to chase down a con man and “get the story.” A railroad telegrapher seeks vigilante-style justice against two robbers who attacked her. An adventure-seeking heiress outruns a giant boulder Indiana Jones-style … decades before Harrison Ford was ever born.
What? Did you know that this existed? Me neither!
More please!
In the current movie landscape, female action heroes tend to be so few and far between that their mere existence seems like an accomplishment (think: Imperator Furiosa in Mad Max: Fury Road, Rey in Star Wars, or the four stars of the upcoming Ghostbusters reboot). But more than a century ago, before women had even won the right to vote in many countries, actresses headed up some of the U.S’s most popular and successful action movies—even if they performed stunts in skirts that ended only a few inches above their ankles.
Incredible. So what happened? How did this come about?
And more importantly: why did it end?
The author of the piece, Radha Vatsal, has some ideas.
I invited Radha Vatsal onto the History of Literature podcast to discuss the article. She has her own book coming out, too: a murder mystery with a plucky female journalist at the center. In New York City. In 1915. What a fantastic idea – I can’t wait for my copy of the book to arrive (it’s available now for pre-order at Amazon.com).
Radha and I talk about her research process, the rise of female journalists in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the changes in the film industry, and developing the character of Kitty Weeks. Oh, and she picks four book recommendations. We discuss those too.
I’ll be posting the episode the first week of May. In the meantime, check out the Atlantic article. And imagine a time when Hollywood didn’t quite have such a stranglehold on the industry…and we could see different kinds of movies…maybe in the past…maybe in the future…
I never knew this existed either; the world isn’t supposed to go backwards.
LikeLike
Exactly! A hundred years later and we’re arguing about whether ghostbusters can be women…
LikeLiked by 2 people
most ignorant argument ever
LikeLike
Totally agree. Radha and I speculate on some reasons for the change in the ’20s- and we wind up optimistic that we’ll see some changes in our era too. We should start with a movie based on her book!
LikeLike
To be honest I’ve never seen Ghostbusters (or if I have I blanked it from my mind) because it has always seemed to me to just be another film where a bunch of men are saving the world. Boring!
The reboot though I actually want to see because it looks different. Finger crossed its great.
LikeLike
I’m hopeful too! It’ll be nice to take my boys to it. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
My first though while reading, was ‘What Happened?’ Then you wrote as much. Looking forward to this interview
LikeLike
I can’t wait to post it! She is an impressive person. 🙂
LikeLike
Wow! I must look this up. I absolutely love silent films too and I’ve not heard of it
LikeLike
Yes – it’s a great article and well worth the read. Stop back in May for my interview with the author too ! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ooh I will!
LikeLike